AMD A12-9800 vs AMD FX-6330

AMD A12-9800
3800 MHz / Cores: 4 / Sep 2016
AMD A12-9800AMD Socket AM4
Type: Desktop

AMD FX-6330
3800 MHz / Cores: 6 / Dec 2015
AMD FX-6330AMD Socket AM3+
Type: Desktop

Summary

Reasons to consider AMD A12-9800

60 watts lower power draw.
Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD FX-6330.
Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider AMD FX-6330

Higher theoretical multi-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

No winner

Gaming

No clear winner declared


No winner

Productivity

No clear winner declared


Specifications

Features

AMD A12-9800AMD FX-6330
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSE4A
AMD64
CnQ
NX bit
AMD-V
SSSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
SSE4a
AES
AVX
CLMUL
CVT16
EVP
FMA4
XOP
Turbo Core
HT3.1

Architecture

AMD A12-9800AMD FX-6330
ArchitectureAMD_ExcavatorvsAMD_Piledriver
MarketDesktopvsDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4vsDDR3
CodenameBristol RidgevsVishera
Release DateSep 2016vsDec 2015

Cores

AMD A12-9800AMD FX-6330
Cores4vs6
Threads4vs6
SMPs1vs1
Integrated GraphicsRadeon R7vsNo

Cache

AMD A12-9800AMD FX-6330
L1 Cache128 KB (per core)vs288 KB
L2 Cache512 KB (per core)vs6144 KB
L3 Cache0 KBvs8192 KB (shared)

Physical

AMD A12-9800AMD FX-6330
SocketAMD Socket AM4vsAMD Socket AM3+
Max Case Tempunknownvsunknown
PackageuPGAvsFC-PGA
Die Size0 mm²vs315 mm²
Process14 nmvs32 nm

Performance

AMD A12-9800AMD FX-6330
Cpu Frequency3800 MHzvs3600 MHz
Turbo Clock Speed4200 MHzvs4200 MHz
Base Clock100 MHzvs200 MHz
Voltageunknownvs1.4 V
TDP65 Wvs125 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD A12-9800
    2898 points
  • AMD FX-6330
    2562 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD A12-9800
    9124 points
  • AMD FX-6330
    10804 points

Points - higher is better