AMD A12-9800 vs AMD FX-6330

AMD A12-9800
3800 MHz / Cores: 4 / Sep 2016
AMD A12-9800 AMD Socket AM4
Type: Desktop

AMD FX-6330
3800 MHz / Cores: 6 / Dec 2015
AMD FX-6330 AMD Socket AM3+
Type: Desktop

Summary

Reasons to consider AMD A12-9800

60 watts lower power draw.
Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the AMD FX-6330.
Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider AMD FX-6330

Higher theoretical multi-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

No winner

Gaming

No clear winner declared


No winner

Productivity

No clear winner declared


Specifications

Features

AMD A12-9800 AMD FX-6330
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSE4A
AMD64
CnQ
NX bit
AMD-V
SSSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
SSE4a
AES
AVX
CLMUL
CVT16
EVP
FMA4
XOP
Turbo Core
HT3.1

Architecture

AMD A12-9800 AMD FX-6330
Architecture AMD_Excavator vs AMD_Piledriver
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 vs DDR3
Codename Bristol Ridge vs Vishera
Release Date Sep 2016 vs Dec 2015

Cores

AMD A12-9800 AMD FX-6330
Cores 4 vs 6
Threads 4 vs 6
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics Radeon R7 vs No

Cache

AMD A12-9800 AMD FX-6330
L1 Cache 128 KB (per core) vs 288 KB
L2 Cache 512 KB (per core) vs 6144 KB
L3 Cache 0 KB vs 8192 KB (shared)

Physical

AMD A12-9800 AMD FX-6330
Socket AMD Socket AM4 vs AMD Socket AM3+
Max Case Temp unknown vs unknown
Package uPGA vs FC-PGA
Die Size 0 mm² vs 315 mm²
Process 14 nm vs 32 nm

Performance

AMD A12-9800 AMD FX-6330
Cpu Frequency 3800 MHz vs 3600 MHz
Turbo Clock Speed 4200 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Base Clock 100 MHz vs 200 MHz
Voltage unknown vs 1.4 V
TDP 65 W vs 125 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD A12-9800
    2898 points
  • AMD FX-6330
    2562 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD A12-9800
    9124 points
  • AMD FX-6330
    10804 points

Points - higher is better