AMD Ryzen 3 3250U vs Intel Celeron G3950

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
AMD Socket FP5MOBILE
2600 MHz / Cores: 2 / Jan 2020
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Celeron G3950
Intel Socket 1151DESKTOP
3000 MHz / Cores: 2 / Jan 2017
Intel Celeron G3950

Summary

Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider Intel Celeron G3950

None

No winner

Gaming

No clear winner declared


No winner

Productivity

No clear winner declared



Specifications

Features

AMD Ryzen 3 3250UIntel Celeron G3950
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
AES-NI
TSX
CLMUL
MPX
SGX

Architecture

AMD Ryzen 3 3250UIntel Celeron G3950
ArchitectureAMD Zen 2vsIntel_Kabylake
MarketMobilevsDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4 Dual-channelvsDDR4
CodenamePicassovsKaby Lake
Release DateJan 2020vsJan 2017

Cores

AMD Ryzen 3 3250UIntel Celeron G3950
Cores2vs2
Threads4vs2
SMPs1vs1
Integrated GraphicsRadeon Vega 3vsIntel HD 610

Cache

AMD Ryzen 3 3250UIntel Celeron G3950
L1 Cache128K (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache512K (per core)vs256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache4MB (shared)vs2048 KB (shared)

Physical

AMD Ryzen 3 3250UIntel Celeron G3950
SocketAMD Socket FP5vsIntel Socket 1151
Max Case TempN/Avs65°C
PackagevsFC-LGA1151
Die Size246mm²vsunknown
Process12 nmvs14 nm

Performance

AMD Ryzen 3 3250UIntel Celeron G3950
Cpu Frequency2600 MHzvs3000 MHz
Turbo Clock3500 MHzvsnone
Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
VoltageN/Avsunknown
TDP15 Wvs51 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
    3920 points
  • Intel Celeron G3950
    3600 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
    7105 points
  • Intel Celeron G3950
    7200 points

Points - higher is better