AMD Ryzen 5 2500U vs AMD A8-3850

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
AMD Socket FP5MOBILE
2000 MHz / Cores: 4 / Oct 2017
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
AMD A8-3850
AMD Socket FM1DESKTOP
2900 MHz / Cores: 4 / Jun 2011
AMD A8-3850

Summary

Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

85 watts lower power draw.
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider AMD A8-3850

Higher theoretical multi-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

Gaming

HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 2500U

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

No winner

Productivity

No clear winner declared



Specifications

Features

AMD Ryzen 5 2500UAMD A8-3850
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSE4A
AMD64
CnQ
NX bit
AMD-V
SMT

Architecture

AMD Ryzen 5 2500UAMD A8-3850
ArchitectureAMD ZenvsAMD LLano
MarketMobilevsDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4vsDDR3
CodenameRaven RidgevsLlano
Release DateOct 2017vsJun 2011

Cores

AMD Ryzen 5 2500UAMD A8-3850
Cores4vs4
Threads8vs4
SMPs1vs1
Integrated GraphicsRadeon Vega 8vsRadeon HD 6550D

Cache

AMD Ryzen 5 2500UAMD A8-3850
L1 Cache128 KB (per core)vs128 KB (per core)
L2 Cache512 KB (per core)vs1024 KB (per core)
L3 Cache4096 KB (shared)vs0 KB

Physical

AMD Ryzen 5 2500UAMD A8-3850
SocketAMD Socket FP5vsAMD Socket FM1
Max Case Tempunknownvsunknown
PackageFP5vsuPGA
Die Size210mm²vs228mm²
Process14 nmvs32 nm

Performance

AMD Ryzen 5 2500UAMD A8-3850
Cpu Frequency2000 MHzvs2900 MHz
Turbo Clock3600 MHzvsnone
Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
Voltageunknownvs1.4125 V
TDP15 Wvs100 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
    3960 points
  • AMD A8-3850
    2900 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
    10736 points
  • AMD A8-3850
    11600 points

Points - higher is better