Intel Celeron G3950 vs AMD A10-9700

Intel Celeron G3950
Intel Socket 1151 DESKTOP
3000 MHz / Cores: 2 / Jan 2017
Intel Celeron G3950

AMD A10-9700
AMD Socket AM4 DESKTOP
3500 MHz / Cores: 4 / Sep 2016
AMD A10-9700

Summary

Synthetic performance index

  • Intel Celeron G3950
    124%
  • AMD A10-9700
    100%

Relative performance

Single thread performance index

  • Intel Celeron G3950
    167%
  • AMD A10-9700
    100%

Relative performance

Multi thread performance index

  • Intel Celeron G3950
    100%
  • AMD A10-9700
    121%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Intel Celeron G3950

Much higher single threaded performance (around 67% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.

Reasons to consider AMD A10-9700

Much higher multi threaded performance (around 21% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.

No winner

Gaming

No clear winner declared


AMD A10-9700

Productivity

HWBench recommends AMD A10-9700

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.



Specifications

Features

Intel Celeron G3950 AMD A10-9700
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
AES-NI
TSX
CLMUL
FMA3
MPX
SGX
3DNow!
SSE4A
AMD64
CnQ
NX bit
AMD-V

Architecture

Intel Celeron G3950 AMD A10-9700
Architecture Intel_Kabylake vs AMD_Excavator
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 vs DDR4
Codename Kaby Lake vs Bristol Ridge
Release Date Jan 2017 vs Sep 2016

Cores

Intel Celeron G3950 AMD A10-9700
Cores 2 vs 4
Threads 2 vs 4
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics Intel HD 610 vs Radeon R7

Cache

Intel Celeron G3950 AMD A10-9700
L1 Cache 64 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core)
L2 Cache 256 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core)
L3 Cache 2048 KB (shared) vs 0 KB

Physical

Intel Celeron G3950 AMD A10-9700
Socket Intel Socket 1151 vs AMD Socket AM4
Max Case Temp 65°C vs unknown
Package FC-LGA1151 vs uPGA
Die Size unknown vs unknown
Process 14 nm vs 14 nm

Performance

Intel Celeron G3950 AMD A10-9700
Cpu Frequency 3000 MHz vs 3500 MHz
Turbo Clock Speed none vs 3800 MHz
Base Clock 100 MHz vs 100 MHz
Voltage unknown vs unknown
TDP 51 W vs 65 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • Intel Celeron G3950
    3600 points
  • AMD A10-9700
    2622 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • Intel Celeron G3950
    7200 points
  • AMD A10-9700
    8404 points

Points - higher is better


Synthetic benchmarks

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

  • Intel Celeron G3950 (simulated)
    134.63
  • AMD A10-9700 (simulated)
    80.52

points - higher is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

  • Intel Celeron G3950 (simulated)
    241.03
  • AMD A10-9700 (simulated)
    293.82

points - higher is better