Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4 vs Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4
Intel Socket 1150SERVER
3500 MHz / Cores: 4 / Jun 2015
Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4

Intel Core i7-6700
Intel Socket 1151DESKTOP
3400 MHz / Cores: 4 / Jul 2015
Intel Core i7-6700

Summary

Reasons to consider Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4

Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the Intel Core i7-6700.

Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-6700

Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

No winner

Gaming

No clear winner declared


No winner

Productivity

No clear winner declared




Specifications

Features

Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4Intel Core i7-6700
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
TXT
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
ECC
HTT
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
x8 SDDC
vPro
TSX
CLMUL
Boost 2.0

Architecture

Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4Intel Core i7-6700
ArchitectureIntel_BroadwellvsIntel_Skylake
MarketServervsDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4vsDDR4
CodenameBroadwell-HvsSkylake
Release DateJun 2015vsJul 2015

Cores

Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4Intel Core i7-6700
Cores4vs4
Threads8vs8
SMPs1vs1
Integrated GraphicsIntel Iris Pro P6300vsNo

Cache

Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4Intel Core i7-6700
L1 Cache64 KB (per core)vs64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache256 KB (per core)vs256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache6144 KB (shared)vs8192 KB (shared)

Physical

Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4Intel Core i7-6700
SocketIntel Socket 1150vsIntel Socket 1151
Max Case Tempunknownvs72°C
PackageFC-LGA12Cvs
Die Size160 mm²vs0 mm²
Process14 nmvs14 nm

Performance

Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4Intel Core i7-6700
Cpu Frequency3500 MHzvs3400 MHz
Turbo Clock Speed3800 MHzvs4000 MHz
Base Clock100 MHzvs100 MHz
Voltageunknownvsunknown
TDP95 Wvs65 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4
    4256 points
  • Intel Core i7-6700
    4600 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4
    18816 points
  • Intel Core i7-6700
    18924 points

Points - higher is better