GeForce 510 OEM vs Radeon R7 340 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 510 OEM |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 340 OEM |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 340 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 510 OEM | | Radeon R7 340 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF119 () | vs | Oland () |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 79 mm² | vs | 90 mm² |
| Transistors | 292 million | vs | 1,040 million |
| Shaders | 48 | vs | 384 |
| Compute Units | 1 | vs | 6 |
| Core clock | 523 MHz | vs | 730 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 510 OEM | | Radeon R7 340 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 898 MHz
1796 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 510 OEM | | Radeon R7 340 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 25 watts | vs | 50 watts |
| Release Date | 29 Sep 2011 | vs | 5 May 2015 |
GeForce 510 OEM
1.05 GP/s
Radeon R7 340 OEM
5.84 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 510 OEM
4.18 GT/s
Radeon R7 340 OEM
17.50 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 510 OEM
14.40 GB/s
Radeon R7 340 OEM
28.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 510 OEM
100.40 GFLOPs
Radeon R7 340 OEM
560.60 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better