GeForce 8800 GS vs GeForce GT 620
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 8800 GS |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 620 |
| 56 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce 8800 GS . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 8800 GS | | GeForce GT 620 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | G92 (G92-150-A2) | vs | GF108 (GF108-100-KB-A1) |
| Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 324 mm² | vs | 116 mm² |
| Transistors | 754 million | vs | 585 million |
| Shaders | 96 | vs | 96 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 550 MHz | vs | 700 MHz |
| ROPs | 12 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 48 | vs | 16 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 8800 GS | | GeForce GT 620 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 384 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 8800 GS | | GeForce GT 620 | |
|---|
| TDP | 105 watts | vs | 49 watts |
| Release Date | 31 Jan 2008 | vs | 15 May 2012 |
GeForce 8800 GS
6.60 GP/s
GeForce GT 620
2.80 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 8800 GS
26.40 GT/s
GeForce GT 620
11.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 8800 GS
38.40 GB/s
GeForce GT 620
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 8800 GS
264.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 620
268.80 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better