GeForce 910M vs Radeon R5 M330
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 910M |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 M330 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R5 M330
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 910M | | Radeon R5 M330 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF117 () | vs | Exo (Exo PRO) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 116 mm² | vs | 77 mm² |
| Transistors | 585 million | vs | 1,040 million |
| Shaders | 96 | vs | 320 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 5 |
| Core clock | 775 MHz | vs | 955 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | vs | 20 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 910M | | Radeon R5 M330 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 910M | | Radeon R5 M330 | |
|---|
| TDP | 33 watts | vs | 18 watts |
| Release Date | 18 Aug 2015 | vs | 5 May 2015 |
GeForce 910M
3.10 GP/s
Radeon R5 M330
8.24 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 910M
12.40 GT/s
Radeon R5 M330
20.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 910M
14.40 GB/s
Radeon R5 M330
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 910M
297.60 GFLOPs
Radeon R5 M330
659.20 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better