GeForce 920M vs GeForce 940MX
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 920M |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce 940MX |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce 920M
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 920M | | GeForce 940MX | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GK208 (N16V-GM) | vs | GM108 (N16S-GT1R) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 87 mm² | vs | 0 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | unknown |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 384 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 3 |
| Core clock | 954 MHz | vs | 795 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 920M | | GeForce 940MX | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 1253 MHz
5012 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 920M | | GeForce 940MX | |
|---|
| TDP | 33 watts | vs | 23 watts |
| Release Date | 13 Mar 2015 | vs | 28 Jun 2016 |
GeForce 920M
7.63 GP/s
GeForce 940MX
6.36 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 920M
30.53 GT/s
GeForce 940MX
19.08 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 920M
14.40 GB/s
GeForce 940MX
40.10 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 920M
732.70 GFLOPs
GeForce 940MX
610.60 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better