GeForce 9300 GS vs GeForce 210

GeForce 9300 GS
Memory: 512Mb DDR2 DESKTOP
Release date: 1 Jun 2008
GeForce 9300 GS
GeForce 210
Memory: 512Mb DDR3 DESKTOP
Release date: 12 Oct 2009
GeForce 210

Summary

Reasons to consider GeForce 9300 GS

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications.
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor.

Reasons to consider GeForce 210

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications.
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor.

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce 9300 GS GeForce 210
GPU Name G98 (G98-700-U2) vs GT218 (GT218-300-B1)
Fab Process 65 nm vs 40 nm
Die Size 86 mm² vs 57 mm²
Transistors 210 million vs 260 million
Shaders 8 vs 16
Compute Units 1 vs 2
Core clock 567 MHz vs 520 MHz
ROPs 4 vs 4
TMUs 8 vs 8

Memory Configuration

GeForce 9300 GS GeForce 210
Memory Type DDR2 vs DDR3
Bus Width 64 bit vs 64 bit
Memory Speed 333 MHz
666 MHz effective
vs 400 MHz
800 MHz effective
Memory Size 512 Mb vs 512 Mb

Additional details

GeForce 9300 GS GeForce 210
TDP 0 watts vs 31 watts
Release Date 1 Jun 2008 vs 12 Oct 2009

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce 9300 GS
    2.27 GP/s
  • GeForce 210
    2.08 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce 9300 GS
    4.54 GT/s
  • GeForce 210
    4.16 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce 9300 GS
    5.33 GB/s
  • GeForce 210
    6.40 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce 9300 GS
    22.40 GFLOPs
  • GeForce 210
    39.36 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better