GeForce 9300 GS vs GeForce 210
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 9300 GS |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce 210 |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 9300 GS | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
GPU Name | G98 (G98-700-U2) | vs | GT218 (GT218-300-B1) |
Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 86 mm² | vs | 57 mm² |
Transistors | 210 million | vs | 260 million |
Shaders | 8 | vs | 16 |
Compute Units | 1 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 567 MHz | vs | 520 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 9300 GS | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 333 MHz
666 MHz effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 9300 GS | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
TDP | 0 watts | vs | 31 watts |
Release Date | 1 Jun 2008 | vs | 12 Oct 2009 |
GeForce 9300 GS
2.27 GP/s
GeForce 210
2.08 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 9300 GS
4.54 GT/s
GeForce 210
4.16 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 9300 GS
5.33 GB/s
GeForce 210
6.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 9300 GS
22.40 GFLOPs
GeForce 210
39.36 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better