GeForce 930MX vs GeForce GTX 260
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 930MX |
165 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 260 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 260 |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce 930MX
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 930MX | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
---|
GPU Name | GM108 (N16S-GMR) | vs | GT200 (G200-100-A2) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 65 nm |
Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 576 mm² |
Transistors | unknown | vs | 1,400 million |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 192 |
Compute Units | 3 | vs | 8 |
Core clock | 952 MHz | vs | 576 MHz |
ROPs | 16 | vs | 28 |
TMUs | 24 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 930MX | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 448 bit |
Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 999 MHz
1998 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 896 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 930MX | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
---|
TDP | 17 watts | vs | 182 watts |
Release Date | 1 Mar 2016 | vs | 16 Jun 2008 |
GeForce 930MX
15.23 GP/s
GeForce GTX 260
16.10 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 930MX
22.85 GT/s
GeForce GTX 260
36.90 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 930MX
14.40 GB/s
GeForce GTX 260
112.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 930MX
731.10 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 260
476.90 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better