GeForce 940MX vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 940MX |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
HWBench recommends Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 940MX | | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GM108 (N16S-GT1R) | vs | Haswell GT3e () |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 22 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 177 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 392 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 40 |
| Compute Units | 3 | vs | 0 |
| Core clock | 795 MHz | vs | 200 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 2 |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 940MX | | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | System Shared |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Speed | 1253 MHz
5012 MHz effective | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 940MX | | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
|---|
| TDP | 23 watts | vs | 45 watts |
| Release Date | 28 Jun 2016 | vs | 3 Jun 2013 |
GeForce 940MX
6.36 GP/s
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
10.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce 940MX
19.08 GT/s
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
20.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce 940MX
40.10 GB/s
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce 940MX
610.60 GFLOPs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
832.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better