GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 6930
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition |
136 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 6930 . |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6930 |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6930
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6930 | |
---|
GPU Name | G96C () | vs | Cayman (Cayman CE) |
Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 121 mm² | vs | 389 mm² |
Transistors | 314 million | vs | 2,640 million |
Shaders | 32 | vs | 1280 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 20 |
Core clock | 550 MHz | vs | 750 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 16 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6930 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective | vs | 1200 MHz
4800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce 9500 GT Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6930 | |
---|
TDP | 50 watts | vs | 186 watts |
Release Date | 19 May 2010 | vs | 1 Dec 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better