GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Memory: 2048Mb DDR4DESKTOP
Release date: 12 Mar 2018
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 3 Jun 2013
Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Summary

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 5200


No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce GT 1030 DDR4Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GPU NameGP108 (GP108-310-A1)vsHaswell GT3e ()
Fab Process14 nmvs22 nm
Die Size74 mm²vs177 mm²
Transistors1,800 millionvs392 million
Shaders384vs40
Compute Units3vs0
Core clock1152 MHzvs200 MHz
ROPs16vs2
TMUs24vs8

Memory Configuration

GeForce GT 1030 DDR4Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Memory TypeDDR4vsSystem Shared
Bus Width64 bitvsSystem Shared
Memory Speed1050 MHz
2100 MHz effective
vsSystem Shared
Memory Size2048 Mbvs0 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GT 1030 DDR4Iris Pro Graphics 5200
TDP20 wattsvs45 watts
Release Date12 Mar 2018vs3 Jun 2013

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
    22.06 GP/s
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200
    10.40 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
    33.10 GT/s
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200
    20.80 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
    16.80 GB/s
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200
    0.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
    1059.00 GFLOPs
  • Iris Pro Graphics 5200
    832.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better