GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 | | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|
GPU Name | GP108 (GP108-310-A1) | vs | Haswell GT3e () |
Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Die Size | 74 mm² | vs | 177 mm² |
Transistors | 1,800 million | vs | 392 million |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 40 |
Compute Units | 3 | vs | 0 |
Core clock | 1152 MHz | vs | 200 MHz |
ROPs | 16 | vs | 2 |
TMUs | 24 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 | | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR4 | vs | System Shared |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | System Shared |
Memory Speed | 1050 MHz
2100 MHz effective | vs | System Shared |
Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 | | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|
TDP | 20 watts | vs | 45 watts |
Release Date | 12 Mar 2018 | vs | 3 Jun 2013 |
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
22.06 GP/s
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
10.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
33.10 GT/s
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
20.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
16.80 GB/s
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
1059.00 GFLOPs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
832.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better