GeForce GT 330 OEM vs Radeon HD 6230
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 330 OEM |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6230 |
| 56 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 330 OEM . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GT 330 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 330 OEM | | Radeon HD 6230 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | G92 () | vs | Cedar (Cedar LE) |
| Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 324 mm² | vs | 59 mm² |
| Transistors | 754 million | vs | 292 million |
| Shaders | 112 | vs | 80 |
| Compute Units | 7 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 500 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 2 |
| TMUs | 56 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 330 OEM | | Radeon HD 6230 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | DDR2 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 510 MHz
1020 MHz effective | vs | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 256 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 330 OEM | | Radeon HD 6230 | |
|---|
| TDP | 75 watts | vs | 19 watts |
| Release Date | 2 Feb 2010 | vs | 2 Jul 2011 |
GeForce GT 330 OEM
8.00 GP/s
Radeon HD 6230
1.30 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GT 330 OEM
28.00 GT/s
Radeon HD 6230
5.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GT 330 OEM
16.30 GB/s
Radeon HD 6230
8.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GT 330 OEM
280.00 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6230
104.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better