GeForce GT 520M vs GeForce GT 520

GeForce GT 520M
Memory: 1024Mb DDR3MOBILE
Release date: 5 Jan 2011
GeForce GT 520M
GeForce GT 520
Memory: 1024Mb DDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 13 Apr 2011
GeForce GT 520

Summary

Synthetic performance index

  • GeForce GT 520M
    100%
  • GeForce GT 520
    103%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 520M

Supports PhysX
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 520

Supports PhysX
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce GT 520MGeForce GT 520
GPU NameGF119 (N12P-GV-B-A1)vsGF119 (GF119-300-A1)
Fab Process40 nmvs40 nm
Die Size79 mm²vs79 mm²
Transistors292 millionvs292 million
Shaders48vs48
Compute Units1vs1
Core clock740 MHzvs810 MHz
ROPs4vs4
TMUs8vs8

Memory Configuration

GeForce GT 520MGeForce GT 520
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Bus Width64 bitvs64 bit
Memory Speed800 MHz
1600 MHz effective
vs900 MHz
1800 MHz effective
Memory Size1024 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GT 520MGeForce GT 520
TDP12 wattsvs29 watts
Release Date5 Jan 2011vs13 Apr 2011

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GT 520M
    1.48 GP/s
  • GeForce GT 520
    1.62 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GT 520M
    5.92 GT/s
  • GeForce GT 520
    6.48 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GT 520M
    12.80 GB/s
  • GeForce GT 520
    14.40 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GT 520M
    142.08 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GT 520
    155.50 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Synthetic benchmarks

3DMark 11

  • GeForce GT 520M
    550
  • GeForce GT 520
    570

Points (higher is better)