GeForce GT 645 OEM vs Radeon R7 250X
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 645 OEM |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 250X |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GT 645 OEM | | Radeon R7 250X | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GF114 () | vs | Cape Verde (Cape Verde XT) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 332 mm² | vs | 123 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,950 million | vs | 1,500 million |
| Shaders | 288 | vs | 640 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 10 |
| Core clock | 776 MHz | vs | 950 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | vs | 40 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GT 645 OEM | | Radeon R7 250X | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 957 MHz
3828 MHz effective | vs | 1125 MHz
4500 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GT 645 OEM | | Radeon R7 250X | |
|---|
| TDP | 102 watts | vs | 80 watts |
| Release Date | 24 Apr 2012 | vs | 13 Feb 2014 |
GeForce GT 645 OEM
9.31 GP/s
Radeon R7 250X
15.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GT 645 OEM
37.20 GT/s
Radeon R7 250X
38.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GT 645 OEM
91.90 GB/s
Radeon R7 250X
72.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GT 645 OEM
894.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R7 250X
1216.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better