GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 150 OEM |
| 78 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTS 150 OEM | | GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
|---|
| GPU Name | G92 () | vs | GT200B (G200-105-B3) |
| Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 324 mm² | vs | 470 mm² |
| Transistors | 754 million | vs | 1,400 million |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 240 |
| Compute Units | 8 | vs | 10 |
| Core clock | 738 MHz | vs | 633 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 28 |
| TMUs | 64 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTS 150 OEM | | GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 448 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective | vs | 1134 MHz
2268 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 896 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTS 150 OEM | | GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
|---|
| TDP | 141 watts | vs | 219 watts |
| Release Date | 10 Mar 2009 | vs | 16 Feb 2010 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better