GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
120 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | | GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition | |
---|
GPU Name | GP107 (GP107-400-A1) | vs | GK104 (GK104-400-A2) |
Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 132 mm² | vs | 294 mm² |
Transistors | 3,300 million | vs | 3,540 million |
Shaders | 768 | vs | 1536 |
Compute Units | 6 | vs | 8 |
Core clock | 1290 MHz | vs | 1006 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 48 | vs | 128 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | | GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | 1752 MHz
7008 MHz effective | vs | 1502 MHz
6008 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | | GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition | |
---|
TDP | 75 watts | vs | 195 watts |
Release Date | 25 Oct 2016 | vs | 3 Apr 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better