GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU116 () | vs | GP104 () |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 16 nm |
| Die Size | 284 mm² | vs | 314 mm² |
| Transistors | 6,600 million | vs | 7,200 million |
| Shaders | 1280 | vs | 1280 |
| Compute Units | 20 | vs | 10 |
| Core clock | 1530 MHz | vs | 1506 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 48 |
| TMUs | 80 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5X |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 192 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1500 MHz
12000 MHz effective | vs | 1001 MHz
8008 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 6144 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X | |
|---|
| TDP | 100 watts | vs | 120 watts |
| Release Date | 22 Nov 2019 | vs | UNRELEASED |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better