GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 Nano
Summary
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
109%
Radeon R9 Nano
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
| 9% higher gaming performance. |
| 75 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R9 Nano . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 Nano |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (12 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | Radeon R9 Nano | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU116 () | vs | Fiji (Fiji XT CA) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 284 mm² | vs | 596 mm² |
| Transistors | 6,600 million | vs | 8,900 million |
| Shaders | 1280 | vs | 4096 |
| Compute Units | 20 | vs | 64 |
| Core clock | 1530 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 64 |
| TMUs | 80 | vs | 256 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | Radeon R9 Nano | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | HBM |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 4096 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1500 MHz
12000 MHz effective | vs | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | | Radeon R9 Nano | |
|---|
| TDP | 100 watts | vs | 175 watts |
| Release Date | 22 Nov 2019 | vs | 27 Aug 2015 |
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
55.20 GP/s
Radeon R9 Nano
64.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
138.00 GT/s
Radeon R9 Nano
256.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
192.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 Nano
512.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4416.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 Nano
8192.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
70
Radeon R9 Nano
46
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
43
Radeon R9 Nano
39
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
66
Radeon R9 Nano
50
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
79
Radeon R9 Nano
93
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
53
Radeon R9 Nano
37
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
30
Radeon R9 Nano
29
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
42
Radeon R9 Nano
35
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
57
Radeon R9 Nano
69
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
28
Radeon R9 Nano
26
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
15
Radeon R9 Nano
17
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
18
Radeon R9 Nano
16
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
32
Radeon R9 Nano
45
FPS (higher is better)