GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650
Memory: 4096Mb GDDR5DESKTOP
Release date: 30 Apr 2019
GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Memory: 3072Mb GDDR5DESKTOP
Release date: 7 Nov 2013
GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Summary

Gaming performance index

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    105%
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650

5% higher gaming performance.
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications

No clear winner declared

These graphics cards seems to have comparable performance based on the game benchmark suite used (10 combinations of games and resolutions).


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPU NameTU107 ()vsGK110B (GK110-425-B1)
Fab Process12 nmvs28 nm
Die Size0 mm²vs561 mm²
Transistorsunknownvs7,080 million
Shaders896vs2880
Compute Units14vs15
Core clock1485 MHzvs875 MHz
ROPs32vs48
TMUs56vs240

Memory Configuration

GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Bus Width128 bitvs384 bit
Memory Speed2000 MHz
8000 MHz effective
vs1750 MHz
7000 MHz effective
Memory Size4096 Mbvs3072 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 780 Ti
TDP0 wattsvs250 watts
Release Date30 Apr 2019vs7 Nov 2013

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    53.28 GP/s
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    52.50 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    93.24 GT/s
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    210.00 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    128.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    336.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    2984.00 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    5040.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Game benchmarks

Grand Theft Auto V

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    77
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    74

FPS (higher is better)

Metro Exodus

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    22
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    25

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest Detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    44
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    31

FPS (higher is better)

Strange Brigade

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    54
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    61

FPS (higher is better)

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    51
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    43

FPS (higher is better)

Grand Theft Auto V

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    49
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    52

FPS (higher is better)

Metro Exodus

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    17
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    19

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest Detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    28
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    21

FPS (higher is better)

Strange Brigade

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    39
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    45

FPS (higher is better)

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    35
  • GeForce GTX 780 Ti
    32

FPS (higher is better)