GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 970

GeForce GTX 1650
Memory: 4096Mb GDDR5 DESKTOP
Release date: 30 Apr 2019
GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 970
Memory: 4096Mb GDDR5 DESKTOP
Release date: 19 Sep 2014
GeForce GTX 970

Summary

Gaming performance index

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    100%
  • GeForce GTX 970
    106%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX.
Supports G-Sync.
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty).
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute.
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 970

6% higher gaming performance.
Supports PhysX.
Supports G-Sync.
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty).

GeForce GTX 970

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 970

The GeForce GTX 970 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (11 combinations of games and resolutions).


Specifications

Core Configuration

GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 970
GPU Name TU107 () vs GM204 (GM204-200-A1)
Fab Process 12 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 0 mm² vs 398 mm²
Transistors unknown vs 5,200 million
Shaders 896 vs 1664
Compute Units 14 vs 13
Core clock 1485 MHz vs 1050 MHz
ROPs 32 vs 56
TMUs 56 vs 104

Memory Configuration

GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 970
Memory Type GDDR5 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 128 bit vs 256 bit
Memory Speed 2000 MHz
8000 MHz effective
vs 1753 MHz
7012 MHz effective
Memory Size 4096 Mb vs 4096 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 970
TDP 0 watts vs 148 watts
Release Date 30 Apr 2019 vs 19 Sep 2014

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    53.28 GP/s
  • GeForce GTX 970
    58.80 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    93.24 GT/s
  • GeForce GTX 970
    109.20 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    128.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GTX 970
    224.40 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    2984.00 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GTX 970
    3494.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Game benchmarks

Destiny 2

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    62
  • GeForce GTX 970
    75

FPS (higher is better)

Grand Theft Auto V

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    77
  • GeForce GTX 970
    79

FPS (higher is better)

Middle-Earth Shadow of War

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    56
  • GeForce GTX 970
    47

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest Detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    44
  • GeForce GTX 970
    44

FPS (higher is better)

Strange Brigade

Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    54
  • GeForce GTX 970
    66

FPS (higher is better)

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    51
  • GeForce GTX 970
    53

FPS (higher is better)

Grand Theft Auto V

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    49
  • GeForce GTX 970
    55

FPS (higher is better)

Middle-Earth Shadow of War

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    38
  • GeForce GTX 970
    31

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest Detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    28
  • GeForce GTX 970
    29

FPS (higher is better)

Strange Brigade

Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    37
  • GeForce GTX 970
    45

FPS (higher is better)

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1650
    35
  • GeForce GTX 970
    42

FPS (higher is better)