GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 390X
Summary
GeForce GTX 1650
100%
Radeon R9 390X
142%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 390X |
| 42% higher gaming performance. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R9 390X
The Radeon R9 390X is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (16 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | | Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU107 () | vs | Grenada (Grenada XT) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 438 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 6,200 million |
| Shaders | 896 | vs | 2816 |
| Compute Units | 14 | vs | 44 |
| Core clock | 1485 MHz | vs | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 64 |
| TMUs | 56 | vs | 176 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | | Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 512 bit |
| Memory Speed | 2000 MHz
8000 MHz effective | vs | 1500 MHz
6000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 8192 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1650 | | Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 275 watts |
| Release Date | 30 Apr 2019 | vs | 18 Jun 2015 |
GeForce GTX 1650
53.28 GP/s
Radeon R9 390X
67.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650
93.24 GT/s
Radeon R9 390X
184.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650
128.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 390X
384.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 1650
2984.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 390X
5914.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650
52
Radeon R9 390X
75
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1650
48
Radeon R9 390X
77
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 11,Windows 10x64 build 1809
GeForce GTX 1650
56
Radeon R9 390X
67
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
GeForce GTX 1650
77
Radeon R9 390X
85
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650
22
Radeon R9 390X
35
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1650
42
Radeon R9 390X
56
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1650
54
Radeon R9 390X
89
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
GeForce GTX 1650
51
Radeon R9 390X
52
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650
32
Radeon R9 390X
56
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1650
31
Radeon R9 390X
51
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX 11,Windows 10x64 build 1809
GeForce GTX 1650
40
Radeon R9 390X
51
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
GeForce GTX 1650
49
Radeon R9 390X
61
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
GeForce GTX 1650
17
Radeon R9 390X
29
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
GeForce GTX 1650
27
Radeon R9 390X
38
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Async Compute Windows10 x64
GeForce GTX 1650
37
Radeon R9 390X
59
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
GeForce GTX 1650
35
Radeon R9 390X
41
FPS (higher is better)