GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 750

GeForce GTX 260
Memory: 896Mb GDDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 16 Jun 2008
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GTX 750
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR5DESKTOP
Release date: 18 Feb 2014
GeForce GTX 750


Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 260

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications.
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor.

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 750

127 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 260 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports PhysX.
Supports G-Sync.
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty).

GeForce GTX 750

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 750

Based on theoretical specifications.


Core Configuration

GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTX 750
GPU NameGT200 (G200-100-A2)vsGM107 (GM107-300-A2)
Fab Process65 nmvs28 nm
Die Size576 mm²vs148 mm²
Transistors1,400 millionvs1,870 million
Compute Units8vs4
Core clock576 MHzvs1020 MHz

Memory Configuration

GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTX 750
Memory TypeGDDR3vsGDDR5
Bus Width448 bitvs128 bit
Memory Speed999 MHz
1998 MHz effective
vs1253 MHz
5012 MHz effective
Memory Size896 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTX 750
TDP182 wattsvs55 watts
Release Date16 Jun 2008vs18 Feb 2014

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 260
    16.10 GP/s
  • GeForce GTX 750
    16.32 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 260
    36.90 GT/s
  • GeForce GTX 750
    32.60 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GTX 260
    112.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GTX 750
    80.20 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GTX 260
    476.90 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GTX 750
    1044.50 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better