GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 760A |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 760A | | GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GK106 (N14E-GL-A1) | vs | GM107 (N16P-GT) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 221 mm² | vs | 148 mm² |
| Transistors | 2,540 million | vs | 1,870 million |
| Shaders | 768 | vs | 640 |
| Compute Units | 4 | vs | 5 |
| Core clock | 628 MHz | vs | 914 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | vs | 40 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 760A | | GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1002 MHz
4008 MHz effective | vs | 1000 MHz
4000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 760A | | GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition | |
|---|
| TDP | 55 watts | vs | 75 watts |
| Release Date | 17 Mar 2014 | vs | 13 Mar 2015 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better