GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon R5 M255
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 760M |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 M255 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 760M
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX 760M | | Radeon R5 M255 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GK106 (N14E-GL-A1) | vs | Topaz (Topaz PRO) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 221 mm² | vs | 77 mm² |
| Transistors | 2,540 million | vs | unknown |
| Shaders | 768 | vs | 384 |
| Compute Units | 4 | vs | 6 |
| Core clock | 628 MHz | vs | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 64 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX 760M | | Radeon R5 M255 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1002 MHz
4008 MHz effective | vs | 1000 MHz
4000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 760M | | Radeon R5 M255 | |
|---|
| TDP | 55 watts | vs | 0 watts |
| Release Date | 30 May 2013 | vs | 12 Oct 2014 |
GeForce GTX 760M
10.05 GP/s
Radeon R5 M255
7.52 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 760M
40.20 GT/s
Radeon R5 M255
22.56 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce GTX 760M
64.10 GB/s
Radeon R5 M255
64.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce GTX 760M
964.60 GFLOPs
Radeon R5 M255
721.90 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better