GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) vs Radeon Pro Duo
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) |
| 100 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon Pro Duo . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon Pro Duo |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | | Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|
| GPU Name | GP102 (GP102) | vs | Capsaicin (Capsaicin XT) |
| Fab Process | 16 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 471 mm² | vs | 596 mm² |
| Transistors | 12,000 million | vs | 8,900 million |
| Shaders | 3584 | vs | 4096 |
| Compute Units | 28 | vs | 64 |
| Core clock | 1417 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | vs | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 | vs | 256 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | | Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | vs | HBM |
| Bus Width | 384 bit | vs | 4096 bit x2 |
| Memory Speed | 1251 MHz
10008 MHz effective | vs | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 12288 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX TITAN X (Pascal) | | Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|
| TDP | 250 watts | vs | 350 watts |
| Release Date | 2 Aug 2016 | vs | 14 Mar 2016 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better