GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon R9 FURY
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2050 |
155 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R9 FURY . |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 FURY |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 2050
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2050 | | Radeon R9 FURY | |
---|
GPU Name | TU107 (TU107) | vs | Fiji (Fiji PRO) |
Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 596 mm² |
Transistors | unknown | vs | 8,900 million |
Shaders | 896 | vs | 3584 |
Compute Units | 14 | vs | 56 |
Core clock | 1515 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 64 |
TMUs | 56 | vs | 224 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2050 | | Radeon R9 FURY | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | HBM |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 4096 bit |
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14000 MHz effective | vs | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 2050 | | Radeon R9 FURY | |
---|
TDP | 120 watts | vs | 275 watts |
Release Date | UNRELEASED | vs | 10 Jul 2015 |
GeForce RTX 2050
54.24 GP/s
Radeon R9 FURY
64.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 2050
94.92 GT/s
Radeon R9 FURY
224.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 2050
224.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 FURY
512.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce RTX 2050
3037.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 FURY
7168.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better