GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs TITAN V
Summary
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
| 75 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the TITAN V . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider TITAN V |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute. |
HWBench recommends TITAN V
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | | TITAN V | |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU104 (TU104-410-A1) | vs | GV100 (GV100-400-A1) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | vs | 12 nm |
| Die Size | 545 mm² | vs | 815 mm² |
| Transistors | 13,600 million | vs | 21,100 million |
| Shaders | 2560 | vs | 5120 |
| Compute Units | 40 | vs | 80 |
| Core clock | 1605 MHz | vs | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | vs | 96 |
| TMUs | 160 | vs | 320 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | | TITAN V | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 3072 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
14000 MHz effective | vs | 850 MHz
1700 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 12288 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | | TITAN V | |
|---|
| TDP | 175 watts | vs | 250 watts |
| Release Date | 9 Jul 2019 | vs | 7 Dec 2017 |
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
113.30 GP/s
TITAN V
139.70 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
283.20 GT/s
TITAN V
465.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
448.00 GB/s
TITAN V
652.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
9060.00 GFLOPs
TITAN V
14899.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better