HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) vs Radeon R5 240 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) |
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 240 OEM |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R5 240 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | | Radeon R5 240 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Sandy Bridge GT1 () | vs | Oland () |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 149 mm² | vs | 90 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | vs | 1,040 million |
| Shaders | 6 | vs | 320 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 5 |
| Core clock | 850 MHz | vs | 730 MHz |
| ROPs | 1 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 1 | vs | 20 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | | Radeon R5 240 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics 2000 (Sandy Bridge GT1) | | Radeon R5 240 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | vs | 50 watts |
| Release Date | 5 Jan 2011 | vs | 1 Nov 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better