HD Graphics 4000 Mobile (Ivy Bridge GT2) vs GeForce GT 415 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 4000 Mobile (Ivy Bridge GT2) |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 415 OEM |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GT 415 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics 4000 Mobile (Ivy Bridge GT2) | | GeForce GT 415 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Ivy Bridge GT2 () | vs | GT216 (GT216-305-A3) |
| Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 133 mm² | vs | 100 mm² |
| Transistors | 392 million | vs | 486 million |
| Shaders | 16 | vs | 48 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 650 MHz | vs | 625 MHz |
| ROPs | 2 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 4 | vs | 16 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics 4000 Mobile (Ivy Bridge GT2) | | GeForce GT 415 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 333 MHz
666 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics 4000 Mobile (Ivy Bridge GT2) | | GeForce GT 415 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 45 watts | vs | 32 watts |
| Release Date | 14 May 2012 | vs | 3 Sep 2010 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better