HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1) vs GeForce GTS 450

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 1 Sep 2015
HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
GeForce GTS 450
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR5DESKTOP
Release date: 13 Sep 2010
GeForce GTS 450

Summary

Reasons to consider HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

91 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTS 450 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 450

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports PhysX.
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications.

GeForce GTS 450

HWBench recommends GeForce GTS 450

Based on theoretical specifications.



Specifications

Core Configuration

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)GeForce GTS 450
GPU NameSkylake GT1 ()vsGF106 (GF106-250-KA-A1)
Fab Process14 nmvs40 nm
Die Size49 mm²vs238 mm²
Transistors189 millionvs1,170 million
Shaders96vs192
Compute Units0vs4
Core clock300 MHzvs783 MHz
ROPs3vs16
TMUs12vs32

Memory Configuration

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)GeForce GTS 450
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR5
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs128 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs902 MHz
3608 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)GeForce GTS 450
TDP15 wattsvs106 watts
Release Date1 Sep 2015vs13 Sep 2010

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.90 GP/s
  • GeForce GTS 450
    6.26 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    3.60 GT/s
  • GeForce GTS 450
    25.10 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GTS 450
    57.70 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    57.60 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GTS 450
    601.30 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better