HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1) vs Radeon HD 4250

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 1 Sep 2015
HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Radeon HD 4250
Memory: 512Mb DDR2DESKTOP
Release date: 25 Feb 2009
Radeon HD 4250

Summary

Reasons to consider HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4250

Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications.

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)Radeon HD 4250
GPU NameSkylake GT1 ()vsRV620 (RV620 LE)
Fab Process14 nmvs55 nm
Die Size49 mm²vs67 mm²
Transistors189 millionvs181 million
Shaders96vs40
Compute Units0vs2
Core clock300 MHzvs594 MHz
ROPs3vs4
TMUs12vs4

Memory Configuration

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)Radeon HD 4250
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsDDR2
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs64 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs396 MHz
792 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs512 Mb

Additional details

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)Radeon HD 4250
TDP15 wattsvs25 watts
Release Date1 Sep 2015vs25 Feb 2009

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.90 GP/s
  • Radeon HD 4250
    2.38 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    3.60 GT/s
  • Radeon HD 4250
    2.38 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.00 GB/s
  • Radeon HD 4250
    6.34 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    57.60 GFLOPs
  • Radeon HD 4250
    47.52 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better