HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1) vs Radeon HD 4250

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Memory: 0Mb System Shared DESKTOP
Release date: 1 Sep 2015
HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Radeon HD 4250
Memory: 512Mb DDR2 DESKTOP
Release date: 25 Feb 2009
Radeon HD 4250

Summary

Reasons to consider HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4250

Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications.

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1) Radeon HD 4250
GPU Name Skylake GT1 () vs RV620 (RV620 LE)
Fab Process 14 nm vs 55 nm
Die Size 49 mm² vs 67 mm²
Transistors 189 million vs 181 million
Shaders 96 vs 40
Compute Units 0 vs 2
Core clock 300 MHz vs 594 MHz
ROPs 3 vs 4
TMUs 12 vs 4

Memory Configuration

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1) Radeon HD 4250
Memory Type System Shared vs DDR2
Bus Width System Shared vs 64 bit
Memory Speed System Shared vs 396 MHz
792 MHz effective
Memory Size 0 Mb vs 512 Mb

Additional details

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1) Radeon HD 4250
TDP 15 watts vs 25 watts
Release Date 1 Sep 2015 vs 25 Feb 2009

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.90 GP/s
  • Radeon HD 4250
    2.38 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    3.60 GT/s
  • Radeon HD 4250
    2.38 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.00 GB/s
  • Radeon HD 4250
    6.34 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    57.60 GFLOPs
  • Radeon HD 4250
    47.52 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better