HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) vs HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) |
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
HWBench recommends HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | | HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Bay Trail GT1 () | vs | Haswell GT2 () |
| Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 22 nm |
| Die Size | 177 mm² | vs | 177 mm² |
| Transistors | 392 million | vs | 392 million |
| Shaders | 4 | vs | 20 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 0 |
| Core clock | 350 MHz | vs | 350 MHz |
| ROPs | 2 | vs | 2 |
| TMUs | 2 | vs | 4 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | | HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | | HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2) | |
|---|
| TDP | 4 watts | vs | 20 watts |
| Release Date | 2 Sep 2013 | vs | 3 Sep 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better