HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) vs HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)

HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
Memory: 0Mb System Shared DESKTOP
Release date: 2 Sep 2013
HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)
Memory: 0Mb System Shared DESKTOP
Release date: 3 Sep 2013
HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)

Summary

Reasons to consider HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)

Reasons to consider HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.

HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)

HWBench recommends HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)
GPU Name Bay Trail GT1 () vs Haswell GT2 ()
Fab Process 22 nm vs 22 nm
Die Size 177 mm² vs 177 mm²
Transistors 392 million vs 392 million
Shaders 4 vs 20
Compute Units 0 vs 0
Core clock 350 MHz vs 350 MHz
ROPs 2 vs 2
TMUs 2 vs 4

Memory Configuration

HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)
Memory Type System Shared vs System Shared
Bus Width System Shared vs System Shared
Memory Speed System Shared vs System Shared
Memory Size 0 Mb vs 0 Mb

Additional details

HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)
TDP 4 watts vs 20 watts
Release Date 2 Sep 2013 vs 3 Sep 2013

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
    0.70 GP/s
  • HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)
    0.70 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
    0.70 GT/s
  • HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)
    1.40 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
    0.00 GB/s
  • HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)
    0.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
    2.80 GFLOPs
  • HD Graphics 4400 (Haswell GT2)
    14.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Similar comparisons