Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 5750
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
| 41 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 5750 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5750 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | Radeon HD 5750 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Haswell GT3e () | vs | Juniper (Juniper LE) |
| Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 177 mm² | vs | 166 mm² |
| Transistors | 392 million | vs | 1,040 million |
| Shaders | 40 | vs | 720 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 9 |
| Core clock | 200 MHz | vs | 700 MHz |
| ROPs | 2 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 36 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | Radeon HD 5750 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1150 MHz
4600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | Radeon HD 5750 | |
|---|
| TDP | 45 watts | vs | 86 watts |
| Release Date | 3 Jun 2013 | vs | 13 Oct 2009 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
10.40 GP/s
Radeon HD 5750
11.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
20.80 GT/s
Radeon HD 5750
25.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 5750
73.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
832.00 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 5750
1008.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better