Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce 9600 GT

Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 5 Sep 2014
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce 9600 GT
Memory: 512Mb GDDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 21 Feb 2008
GeForce 9600 GT

Summary

Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200

80 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce 9600 GT .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider GeForce 9600 GT

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications.
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor.

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce 9600 GT
GPU NameBroadwell GT3e ()vsG94 (G94-300-A1)
Fab Process14 nmvs65 nm
Die Size49 mm²vs240 mm²
Transistors189 millionvs505 million
Shaders384vs64
Compute Units0vs4
Core clock300 MHzvs650 MHz
ROPs6vs16
TMUs48vs32

Memory Configuration

Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce 9600 GT
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR3
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs256 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs900 MHz
1800 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs512 Mb

Additional details

Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce 9600 GT
TDP15 wattsvs95 watts
Release Date5 Sep 2014vs21 Feb 2008

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    1.80 GP/s
  • GeForce 9600 GT
    10.40 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    14.40 GT/s
  • GeForce 9600 GT
    20.80 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce 9600 GT
    57.60 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    230.40 GFLOPs
  • GeForce 9600 GT
    208.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better