Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)

Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 5 Sep 2014
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 11 Jun 2014
Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)

Summary

Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Reasons to consider Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)


No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
GPU NameBroadwell GT3e ()vsMullins ()
Fab Process14 nmvs28 nm
Die Size49 mm²vs0 mm²
Transistors189 millionvsunknown
Shaders384vs128
Compute Units0vs2
Core clock300 MHzvs800 MHz
ROPs6vs4
TMUs48vs8

Memory Configuration

Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsSystem Shared
Bus WidthSystem SharedvsSystem Shared
Memory SpeedSystem SharedvsSystem Shared
Memory Size0 Mbvs0 Mb

Additional details

Iris Pro Graphics 6200Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
TDP15 wattsvs15 watts
Release Date5 Sep 2014vs11 Jun 2014

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    1.80 GP/s
  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
    3.20 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    14.40 GT/s
  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
    6.40 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    0.00 GB/s
  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
    0.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    230.40 GFLOPs
  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
    204.80 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better