Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)

Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Memory: 0Mb System Shared DESKTOP
Release date: 5 Sep 2014
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
Memory: 0Mb System Shared DESKTOP
Release date: 11 Jun 2014
Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)

Summary

Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Reasons to consider Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)


No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
GPU Name Broadwell GT3e () vs Mullins ()
Fab Process 14 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 49 mm² vs 0 mm²
Transistors 189 million vs unknown
Shaders 384 vs 128
Compute Units 0 vs 2
Core clock 300 MHz vs 800 MHz
ROPs 6 vs 4
TMUs 48 vs 8

Memory Configuration

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
Memory Type System Shared vs System Shared
Bus Width System Shared vs System Shared
Memory Speed System Shared vs System Shared
Memory Size 0 Mb vs 0 Mb

Additional details

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
TDP 15 watts vs 15 watts
Release Date 5 Sep 2014 vs 11 Jun 2014

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    1.80 GP/s
  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
    3.20 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    14.40 GT/s
  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
    6.40 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    0.00 GB/s
  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
    0.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    230.40 GFLOPs
  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
    204.80 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better