Radeon HD 4730 vs Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)

Radeon HD 4730
Memory: 512Mb GDDR5DESKTOP
Release date: 8 Jun 2009
Radeon HD 4730
Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 23 Jul 2013
Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4730

Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)

50 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 4730 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)
GPU NameRV770 (RV770 CE)vsTurks (Turks PRO)
Fab Process55 nmvs40 nm
Die Size256 mm²vs118 mm²
Transistors956 millionvs716 million
Shaders640vs480
Compute Units8vs6
Core clock750 MHzvs650 MHz
ROPs8vs8
TMUs32vs24

Memory Configuration

Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR3
Bus Width128 bitvs128 bit
Memory Speed900 MHz
3600 MHz effective
vs800 MHz
1600 MHz effective
Memory Size512 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)
TDP110 wattsvs60 watts
Release Date8 Jun 2009vs23 Jul 2013

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon HD 4730
    6.00 GP/s
  • Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)
    5.20 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon HD 4730
    24.00 GT/s
  • Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)
    15.60 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon HD 4730
    57.60 GB/s
  • Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)
    25.60 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon HD 4730
    960.00 GFLOPs
  • Radeon HD 8510 OEM (Turks PRO)
    624.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better