Radeon HD 5730 vs GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5730 |
155 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 5730 | | GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
---|
GPU Name | Redwood (Redwood XT) | vs | GT200B (G200-105-B3) |
Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 55 nm |
Die Size | 104 mm² | vs | 470 mm² |
Transistors | 627 million | vs | 1,400 million |
Shaders | 400 | vs | 240 |
Compute Units | 5 | vs | 10 |
Core clock | 775 MHz | vs | 633 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 28 |
TMUs | 20 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 5730 | | GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 448 bit |
Memory Speed | 1000 MHz
4000 MHz effective | vs | 1134 MHz
2268 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 896 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 5730 | | GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
---|
TDP | 64 watts | vs | 219 watts |
Release Date | 26 Feb 2011 | vs | 16 Feb 2010 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better