Radeon HD 6410D IGP vs Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000)
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6410D IGP |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) |
| 50 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 6410D IGP . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6410D IGP
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 6410D IGP | | Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) | |
|---|
| GPU Name | WinterPark () | vs | Mullins () |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 59 mm² | vs | 0 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | unknown |
| Shaders | 160 | vs | 128 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 600 MHz | vs | 700 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 6410D IGP | | Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 6410D IGP | | Radeon R2 Graphics IGP (APU E2-4000) | |
|---|
| TDP | 65 watts | vs | 15 watts |
| Release Date | 20 Jun 2011 | vs | 27 Feb 2015 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better