Radeon HD 6530D IGP vs GeForce GT 330 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6530D IGP |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 330 OEM |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 6530D IGP | | GeForce GT 330 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | BeaverCreek () | vs | G92 () |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm |
| Die Size | 228 mm² | vs | 324 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,450 million | vs | 754 million |
| Shaders | 320 | vs | 112 |
| Compute Units | 4 | vs | 7 |
| Core clock | 443 MHz | vs | 500 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 16 | vs | 56 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 6530D IGP | | GeForce GT 330 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR2 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 510 MHz
1020 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 256 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 6530D IGP | | GeForce GT 330 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 65 watts | vs | 75 watts |
| Release Date | 20 Jun 2011 | vs | 2 Feb 2010 |
Radeon HD 6530D IGP
3.54 GP/s
GeForce GT 330 OEM
8.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 6530D IGP
7.09 GT/s
GeForce GT 330 OEM
28.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 6530D IGP
0.00 GB/s
GeForce GT 330 OEM
16.30 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 6530D IGP
283.50 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 330 OEM
280.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better