Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs Radeon HD 6350

Radeon HD 8400 IGP
Memory: 0Mb System Shared DESKTOP
Release date: 23 Nov 2013
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
Radeon HD 6350
Memory: 512Mb GDDR3 DESKTOP
Release date: 7 Feb 2011
Radeon HD 6350

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8400 IGP

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6350

Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications.

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon HD 8400 IGP Radeon HD 6350
GPU Name Kalindi () vs Cedar (Cedar PRO)
Fab Process 28 nm vs 40 nm
Die Size 110 mm² vs 59 mm²
Transistors 1,178 million vs 292 million
Shaders 128 vs 80
Compute Units 2 vs 2
Core clock 400 MHz vs 650 MHz
ROPs 4 vs 4
TMUs 8 vs 8

Memory Configuration

Radeon HD 8400 IGP Radeon HD 6350
Memory Type System Shared vs GDDR3
Bus Width System Shared vs 64 bit
Memory Speed System Shared vs 400 MHz
800 MHz effective
Memory Size 0 Mb vs 512 Mb

Additional details

Radeon HD 8400 IGP Radeon HD 6350
TDP 25 watts vs 19 watts
Release Date 23 Nov 2013 vs 7 Feb 2011

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon HD 8400 IGP
    1.60 GP/s
  • Radeon HD 6350
    2.60 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon HD 8400 IGP
    3.20 GT/s
  • Radeon HD 6350
    5.20 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon HD 8400 IGP
    0.00 GB/s
  • Radeon HD 6350
    6.40 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon HD 8400 IGP
    102.40 GFLOPs
  • Radeon HD 6350
    104.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better