Radeon HD 8670A vs Radeon E6465
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8670A |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon E6465 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 8670A
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 8670A | | Radeon E6465 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Mars (Mars XT) | vs | Caicos () |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 77 mm² | vs | 67 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,040 million | vs | 370 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 160 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 600 MHz | vs | 600 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 8670A | | Radeon E6465 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective | vs | 800 MHz
3200 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8670A | | Radeon E6465 | |
|---|
| TDP | 45 watts | vs | 25 watts |
| Release Date | 2 Feb 2013 | vs | 29 Sep 2015 |
Radeon HD 8670A
4.80 GP/s
Radeon E6465
2.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8670A
14.40 GT/s
Radeon E6465
4.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8670A
16.00 GB/s
Radeon E6465
25.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 8670A
460.80 GFLOPs
Radeon E6465
192.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better