Radeon HD 8670D IGP vs GeForce GTS 250
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8670D IGP |
50 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTS 250 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 250 |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 8670D IGP
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 8670D IGP | | GeForce GTS 250 | |
---|
GPU Name | Devastator () | vs | G92B (G92-428-B1) |
Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 55 nm |
Die Size | 246 mm² | vs | 260 mm² |
Transistors | 1,303 million | vs | 754 million |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 128 |
Compute Units | 6 | vs | 8 |
Core clock | 844 MHz | vs | 702 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 24 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 8670D IGP | | GeForce GTS 250 | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8670D IGP | | GeForce GTS 250 | |
---|
TDP | 100 watts | vs | 150 watts |
Release Date | 12 Mar 2013 | vs | 4 Mar 2009 |
Radeon HD 8670D IGP
6.75 GP/s
GeForce GTS 250
11.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8670D IGP
20.30 GT/s
GeForce GTS 250
44.90 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8670D IGP
0.00 GB/s
GeForce GTS 250
64.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 8670D IGP
648.20 GFLOPs
GeForce GTS 250
387.10 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better