Radeon HD 8670D IGP vs GeForce GTX 295

Radeon HD 8670D IGP
Memory: 0Mb System Shared DESKTOP
Release date: 12 Mar 2013
Radeon HD 8670D IGP
GeForce GTX 295
Memory: 896Mb GDDR3 DESKTOP
Release date: 8 Jan 2009
GeForce GTX 295

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8670D IGP

189 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 295 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications.

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 295

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications.
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor.

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon HD 8670D IGP GeForce GTX 295
GPU Name Devastator () vs GT200B (G200-400-B3)
Fab Process 32 nm vs 55 nm
Die Size 246 mm² vs 470 mm²
Transistors 1,303 million vs 1,400 million
Shaders 384 vs 240
Compute Units 6 vs 10
Core clock 844 MHz vs 576 MHz
ROPs 8 vs 28
TMUs 24 vs 80

Memory Configuration

Radeon HD 8670D IGP GeForce GTX 295
Memory Type System Shared vs GDDR3
Bus Width System Shared vs 448 bit x2
Memory Speed System Shared vs 999 MHz
1998 MHz effective
Memory Size 0 Mb vs 896 Mb

Additional details

Radeon HD 8670D IGP GeForce GTX 295
TDP 100 watts vs 289 watts
Release Date 12 Mar 2013 vs 8 Jan 2009

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon HD 8670D IGP
    6.75 GP/s
  • GeForce GTX 295
    32.20 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon HD 8670D IGP
    20.30 GT/s
  • GeForce GTX 295
    92.20 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon HD 8670D IGP
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GTX 295
    224.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon HD 8670D IGP
    648.20 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GTX 295
    1192.40 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better