Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) vs GeForce 405 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce 405 OEM |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) | | GeForce 405 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Mullins () | vs | GT216 () |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 100 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 486 million |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 48 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 267 MHz | vs | 475 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 16 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) | | GeForce 405 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) | | GeForce 405 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 25 watts |
| Release Date | 28 Jan 2015 | vs | 3 Sep 2010 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better