Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) vs GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition

Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 28 Jan 2015
Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200)
GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
Memory: 512Mb GDDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 20 Jan 2009
GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200)

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200)GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
GPU NameMullins ()vsG96C ()
Fab Process28 nmvs55 nm
Die Size0 mm²vs121 mm²
Transistorsunknownvs314 million
Shaders128vs32
Compute Units2vs2
Core clock267 MHzvs550 MHz
ROPs4vs8
TMUs8vs16

Memory Configuration

Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200)GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR3
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs128 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs800 MHz
1600 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs512 Mb

Additional details

Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200)GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
TDP15 wattsvs50 watts
Release Date28 Jan 2015vs20 Jan 2009

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200)
    1.07 GP/s
  • GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
    4.40 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200)
    2.14 GT/s
  • GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
    8.80 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200)
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
    25.60 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200)
    68.35 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
    89.60 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better