Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) vs Radeon HD 6770
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) |
| 93 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 6770 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6770 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6770
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) | | Radeon HD 6770 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Mullins () | vs | Juniper (Juniper XT) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 166 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 1,040 million |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 800 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 10 |
| Core clock | 267 MHz | vs | 850 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 40 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) | | Radeon HD 6770 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1200 MHz
4800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) | | Radeon HD 6770 | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 108 watts |
| Release Date | 28 Jan 2015 | vs | 21 Jan 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better