Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) vs Radeon R7 250

Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 11 Jun 2014
Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
Radeon R7 250
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR5DESKTOP
Release date: 8 Oct 2013
Radeon R7 250

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)

50 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R7 250 .

Reasons to consider Radeon R7 250

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute.
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty).
Supports Mantle.

Radeon R7 250

HWBench recommends Radeon R7 250

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)Radeon R7 250
GPU NameMullins ()vsOland (Oland XT)
Fab Process28 nmvs28 nm
Die Size0 mm²vs90 mm²
Transistorsunknownvs1,040 million
Shaders128vs384
Compute Units2vs6
Core clock800 MHzvs1000 MHz
ROPs4vs8
TMUs8vs24

Memory Configuration

Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)Radeon R7 250
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR5
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs128 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs1150 MHz
4600 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)Radeon R7 250
TDP15 wattsvs65 watts
Release Date11 Jun 2014vs8 Oct 2013

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
    3.20 GP/s
  • Radeon R7 250
    8.00 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
    6.40 GT/s
  • Radeon R7 250
    24.00 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
    0.00 GB/s
  • Radeon R7 250
    73.60 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
    204.80 GFLOPs
  • Radeon R7 250
    768.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better